Why ESG and EDI must stay in architecture’s vocabulary

Rob Bearyman Bennetts Associates cropped

Source: Bennetts Associates

Rob Bearyman argues that equality, sustainability and inclusion remain central to how we design

Words matter. Especially in architecture, where language sets the brief, secures the funding and guides everything from placemaking to planning policy. So, when terms like equality, sustainability and inclusion begin disappearing from official guidance – whether across the Atlantic or more subtly here at home – it’s time to pay attention.

The US has seen recent high-profile rollbacks of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) commitments, affecting how government agencies, cultural institutions and even design professionals can describe their work. And while the UK hasn’t followed suit, the potential ripple effect is real: softening language, second-guessing strategies and growing hesitancy around terms that have long been part of our shared architectural vocabulary.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.