The government’s race to remediate unsafe homes: the promises and pitfalls

Andrew Mellor_PRP_crop

Andrew Mellor examines the government’s latest plan to accelerate building remediation, questioning whether speed can be achieved without compromising safety and quality

The government recently published its Remediation Acceleration Plan, which relates to the external walls of multi-occupancy residential buildings over 11m in height. The published plan is the first stage of the proposals by the government to “fix buildings faster” and “to remediate at pace” to ensure that the risks and costs to residents of living in buildings that are deemed unsafe are reduced as quickly as possible. It is proposed that the second phase of the plan will be published in summer 2025.

Although I completely agree that the buildings must be remediated as soon as possible, the use of the word pace is a little worrying, as we do not want to be remediating buildings only to have to remediate them again due to non-compliance or poor-quality construction work. This has happened with some of the buildings that were remediated in the first years following the Grenfell tragedy.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.