Meanwhile… here’s a great way to test your risky brainwaves

Martyn Evans index

Placemaking is a responsibility not a workstream, argues Martyn Evans

I recently joined a Space UK panel at the Ministry of Sound in London. Our subject: placemaking. When Jenni Carbins, our panel host, asked me in the week before the event what I’d like to suggest as topics for our discussion I asked if we could discuss banning that word.

Please don’t get me wrong – I’m not against the making of great places. Far from it. What I object to is the definition that the term has come to assume in our industry and the contribution it makes to the delivery of bad places.

To identify placemaking as a subject we should be discussing in our industry is to define it as a skill or, worse, a workstream. That implies that “development” is something else and that as long as you apply some good placemaking skills, all will be well. I believe that there is either good development or bad development. Good development delivers great places and bad development… doesn’t.

This content is available to registered users | Already registered?Login here

You are not currently logged in.

To continue reading this story, sign up for free guest access

Existing Subscriber? LOGIN

REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts. You get:

  • Up to the minute architecture news from around the UK
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

 

Subscribe to Building Design and you will benefit from:

Gated access promo

  • Unlimited news
  • Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
  • Technical studies
  • Full access to all our online archives
  • PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45

Subscribe now for unlimited access.